Why the Wikipedia

on drug overdose deaths is not really informative source The New York Times title Wikipedia article about the ‘deaths’ of people who overdosed on fentanyl, heroin, MDMA and methadone: a useful tool article The Washington Times article “Deaths of people using drugs and prescription opioids have become the most widely reported cases in the United States.

But while they are the most commonly reported cause of death, their true number is hard to know.

The data on overdose deaths, which are a subset of all deaths, are not publicly available.”

The article provides an overview of the sources of overdose deaths in the U.S. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, between 2000 and 2015, the number of deaths attributed to overdose in the country rose by approximately 2.6 percent annually.

The increase in overdose deaths has also been attributed to the introduction of prescription opioid medications, particularly hydrocodone, oxycodone, hydromorphone and methcathinone.

“The rise in overdose death rates may reflect the increasing use of opioids in treating chronic pain, a problem that was previously considered a rare disease,” the article says.

The article then goes on to detail the types of drugs that have been linked to overdose deaths.

The “primary contributing factors” cited by the article for many of these overdoses are opioids, fentanyl, MDMA, methamphetamine, benzodiazepines, codeine, and prescription painkillers.

According the article, these drugs can cause the respiratory system to overreact to the drugs, causing respiratory depression, confusion, confusion and death.

“This could happen, for example, when people overdose on fentanyl or other drugs, or when a person uses methamphetamines or other prescription opioids for pain,” the author says.

“When someone overdoses on fentanyl and other opioids, the respiratory depression and confusion can result in death.”

In the case of hydrocide, the article explains that hydrocidal agents are commonly found in the body.

Hydrocide is the active ingredient in fentanyl and is often associated with overdoses in patients with chronic pain.

According a report from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, the percentage of drug overdose fatalities in 2015 was 8.4 percent.

“It is not uncommon for a person to take fentanyl or another fentanyl analog when they overdose,” the authors write.

“However, the drug that caused this person’s death was hydrocodic acid, which is a hydrocannabinoid that is produced by the plant Cannabis sativa.

The amount of hydracodic acid in a person’s body can vary greatly, ranging from as low as 3 mg/kg body weight to as high as 100 mg/day.”

The study says that a person who is taking hydrocondisaboloids, an FDA-approved drug for treating pain, should be monitored for respiratory depression for 24 hours after their dose of the drug.

“Hydrocodones are commonly used for a variety of indications, including pain management, nausea, vomiting, insomnia, and constipation.

A person who has recently been treated for chronic pain should be prescribed a hydocodone if symptoms of respiratory depression persist,” the study says.

According its authors, the lack of information about the number and severity of drug overdoses in the nation is due to the lack and limited availability of comprehensive data.

In 2016, the Drug Enforcement Administration launched a nationwide effort to collect data on drug overdoses, the Substance Use and Mental Disorders Services Administration (SAMHSA) announced that it would launch a new website to collect drug overdose data, and the Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) launched a website to monitor and share information about drug overdose.

“Although many people do not know the exact number of overdose fatalities or the precise types of drug-related deaths that occur, they do know that there are many people who have died because of a drug overdose,” says SAMHSA Administrator Michele Leonhart.

“These deaths are preventable and, as we have seen, are preventative.

Our nation is safer today because of our efforts to prevent and respond to drug-involved deaths.”

A recent survey of drug and alcohol overdose deaths found that there were 6,974 deaths linked to drug overdoses from January to May of 2018, an increase of over 1,000 deaths from January through June of 2017.

According it, the majority of deaths associated with drug overdoses were suicides and accidental drug overdoses.

According another survey conducted by SAMHS in April of 2018 and released by the Drug Policy Alliance (DPA), over 5,200 people died from drug overdoses during the same time period.

The DPA found that the majority (60 percent) of these deaths were due to opioids.

In 2017, the most recent year for which data is available, the DPA also found that heroin and fentanyl were the two most commonly used drugs in the US.

According DPA, “over the past decade, heroin and opioids have been found to be the leading cause of overdose death in the American population,

Informed essay: The Case for ‘Informed Consent’

Posted March 02, 2018 12:27:00 I want to start by giving some credit where credit is due.

In this essay, I want you to read the following article from the book The Case For Informed Consent, which I highly recommend.

In it, the author, Christopher Hitchens, argues that there is a problem with consent because it is too vague, lacking in evidence and devoid of any objective standard.

The argument goes something like this: It is not the case that a man’s sexual behavior must be voluntary; it is not even the case, for example, that all people who engage in sex must be equally free to say “no” and not be coerced into doing so.

Instead, the case for consent rests on three different assumptions.

The first is that consent is voluntary.

It is the belief that consent must be a condition of all human relationships.

The second is that it is impossible to have nonconsensual sex.

It’s the belief in the power of the state to control people and to deny them their liberty to have sexual relationships.

And the third is that, when it comes to sex, we can be very open to and open to others being open to sex as well.

In short, there is no consensus on what is the best or worst form of consent.

That’s why I want us to start with the last assumption, and then take it from there.

If consent can be understood in a broad, inclusive sense, then, for all practical purposes, we have arrived at a consensus on the best form of sexual consent.

What we have is a form of human consent that is inclusive and free of coercion.

It can be thought of as the human equivalent of a doctor’s exam, or the human version of a condom.

It has to do with knowing the patient, and not the patient’s anatomy or sexual orientation.

But what we don’t know is whether this is good or bad.

That, too, is a question that has been debated by both men and women.

The American Psychological Association has been debating the issue since 2003, when the American Psychological Society issued a statement that, in essence, argued that sexual consent should be understood as a form not just of “knowing the patient,” but of “feeling what it feels like to be a person.”

The statement went on to say that it would not matter whether the patient were gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender.

It would only matter that the patient felt that their sexual desire was legitimate.

There was no reason to think that there would be a difference in the way that people would react to sexual situations.

But a growing body of scientific evidence suggests otherwise.

For example, research by the University of Washington and Columbia University has found that people are more likely to say sexual contact between men and men, regardless of whether they are heterosexual or gay.

These findings have led some researchers to suggest that sexual encounters between gay and straight men are “inappropriate” and therefore “harmful.”

The American Psychiatric Association has called for an end to the “heterosexualization” of sex.

As the APA’s statement noted, this means that “gay or lesbian men may be able to have sex with men, but heterosexual men are not.”

Similarly, researchers at the University and University of Maryland School of Medicine found that “heterosexually active gay and bisexual men may have less sex than heterosexuals.”

There’s a growing consensus that there are differences between consent and consenting sexual behavior.

And when it is clear that one is not consenting, the question becomes: Do we need to change our ways of thinking about consent?

The question of whether people should be forced to give consent, and whether it is appropriate for the government to control who has sex with whom, has been a source of contention for many years.

This is not to say, of course, that there isn’t any evidence that some forms of coercion are necessary.

But there is also a growing scientific consensus that consenting sex between men is both morally acceptable and safe.

What is not clear is whether we need government to enforce our views on the issue.

And in fact, we do have to think hard about whether there are any ethical problems in using coercion as a means to enforce the will of another person.

In fact, some have suggested that the best way to address the problem of coercion is to simply ban coercive relationships altogether.

This idea comes from the writings of the philosopher Bertrand Russell, whose famous essay “The Problem of Consent” was written in the late 1950s.

The problem, Russell argued, was that men and boys are often the victims of coercive sex, and that the reason for this is that women have an innate sense of justice that can be used to justify their actions.

In other words, the “social contract” that men agree to in exchange for sexual relations is often unjust, and they are sometimes even the victims.

In his essay, Russell said that this is the real problem with

How to understand the military helicopter story

More than half of Canada’s combat aircraft were destroyed by enemy fire during the first seven years of the Afghan war, according to a report by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) and the Canadian Military Academy (CMA).

The RCMP, the CMA and Statistics Canada released a joint report Wednesday outlining the findings of their work.

The RCMP released the report on the eve of a federal inquiry into the death of a Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) helicopter pilot during a bombing raid in 2009.

The CMA has not released a similar report but has said it found “high levels of loss of life” in the years following the war.

The Canadian Military Institute (CMII) reported in 2011 that “over one-quarter of all operational helicopters in Afghanistan were lost.”

The CAA has previously criticized the RCMP’s conclusions.

The report is part of the annual report the association’s executive board releases every year on Canada’s military and security forces.

“It’s a terrible shame to see that the CAA is finding high levels of damage to our helicopters,” said CAA president Michael McKeon.

“We want to make sure that every single helicopter that comes to our nation is equipped and safe, and it’s a matter of time before we’re able to do that.”

The RCMP’s report was based on data from the agency’s helicopter accident and disaster records and a review of data collected by the CDA.

The CAA and CMII said the information the report included was “totalled in the tens of thousands” of records, including helicopter fatalities and injuries.

The report also found that the RCMP and CMA were not conducting a thorough analysis of the helicopter industry.

“The CDA did not investigate whether the Canadian military has a process or process of reporting helicopter losses to the Canadian Armed Forces,” the report said.

“The CBA has no data on this.

The data is based on the RCMP reporting that there were 2,932 reported helicopter fatalities during the period from September 2001 to October 2014.”

The report does not address whether there are any other issues that have contributed to the high levels, such as “poor maintenance and a lack of training” for pilots.

The RCAF, which has also not released similar data, has said the Canadian Forces has improved the “systematic review of its operational risk assessments.”